Another great review of the whole process of meiosis can be found here
We then discussed the significance of Griffith's experiments with pneumonia and mice. The conclusion he was able to draw was that a specific molecule is responsible for genetic traits. However, his work did not show that this molecule was DNA. Most scientists still believed that proteins were the more likely candidate.
Your book does not spend much time discussing the significant contributions of Avery, McLeod and MacCarty so I gave each table a worksheet that gave an overview of their experimental design and a picture of the results they received. Students drew conclusions based on this information and determined that this experiment showed that DNA must be the transforming agent in Griffith's work.
The homework for tonight is to review the structure of DNA.
Then watch the animation describing DNA structure HERE.
And examine DNA structure at DNA Interactive. At DNA Interactive examine the module titled "Finding the Structure." Use the tabs at the top to navigate. When you look at "pieces of the puzzle" take some time to read about Rosalind Franklin's X-ray and Pauling's triple helix.
- What two things did Watson and Crick learn from her X-ray?
- Why was Pauling's triple helix impossible?
- Click through the Clues and write down the rules of base pairing that are given to you.
In 1968, James D. Watson published a famous book about this historic discovery (The Double Helix: A Personal Account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA). It isn't at all what you might expect: it is about why as well as how Watson and Crick were the ones who published the structure of DNA, and the "why" part makes it a very interesting (and controversial) story. I read the Norton Critical Edition, which has a preface explaining why the book was controversial when it first came out (it showed that scientists are often driven by their ego and all the other things that make us human as anyone else, which isn't the rosy picture of scientists that was more common in the 50s and 60s). The Double Helix remains one of the most interesting books I have ever read, and I think it would be just as interesting today as it was 20 years ago.
ReplyDelete